Product description: The product under consideration is belting fabric made of 80% or more of polyester or nylon in any combination, excluding Chafer fabric and grey fabric/undipped fabric. The following is the PCN methodology:

SN	Warp 1	Warp 2	Weft	PCN Code
1	Polyester	–	Polyester	EE
2	Polyester	Polyester	Polyester	EEE
3	Polyester	–	High Elongation Polyester	EEH
4	Polyester	High Elongation Polyester	High Elongation Polyester	EHH
5	Polyester	–	Spun polyester	EES
6	Nylon 6	–	Nylon 6	NN
7	Nylon 6	–	Spun Polyester	NES

HS Codes: The product under consideration does not have a dedicated code and are classified under subheading 5906 99 90 of Chapter 59, Customs Tariff Act.

Country Involved: China PR

Applicant: SRF Limited

Supporters: Grabtech Fabrics LLP, Madura Industrial Textiles, NRC Industries Ltd., and Sanrhea Technical Textiles Limited.

Date of Initiation: 27^th September 2025

Period of Investigation: 1st April 2024 to 31st March 2025 (12 months)

Injury Period: 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24 and POI

Margins and Recommended Duties:

Exporters	Dumping Margin	Injury Margin	Duty (USD/MT)
Xuyi Huacheng Industrial Cloth Co. Ltd., Wuxi Polymico Materials Co. Ltd. and Qingdao Chenlanxin Business and Trading Co. Ltd. (Group)	60-70%	30-40%	678%
Qingzhou Shengbo New Products Co. Ltd.	40-50%	30-40%	731%
Jiangsu Taiji Industry New Materials Co. Ltd	30-40%	10-20%	374%
Non-sampled producers	40-50%	25-35%	630%
All other producers	210-220%	120-130%	1,620%

Key Findings:

1. The product under consideration is Belting Fabric made of 80% or more of polyester or nylon in any combination, subject to the exclusions already specified in these Final Findings, including Chafer fabric, grey/undipped fabric, Nylon 6,6 and the notified excluded warp-weft constructions.
2. The demand for the product under consideration has increased over the injury period.
3. The import volume has increased over the injury period. The volume of imports is quite significant in relation to consumption in India.
4. The price undercutting is positive and significant in the period of investigation.
5. The prices of the domestic industry are depressed in POI when compared to the base year or preceding year.
6. The profits, cash profits, and profit before interest on gross domestic sales and the return on capital employed have declined over the injury period. Despite selling higher volumes, the domestic industry suffered deterioration in these parameters.
7. The return on investment of the domestic industry was the lowest in the period of investigation.
8. The dumping margins determined for the sampled producers/exporters, the cooperating non-sampled category and the residual category are positive and significant.
9. The information on record does not establish that the recommended duty would cause a material adverse effect on the downstream industry.
10. The measure addresses injury caused by dumped imports while preserving the option of sourcing from domestic and imported suppliers.
11. The imposition of anti-dumping duty would not be against the public interest and the impact of imposition of anti-dumping duty on the final product is negligible.
12. The Authority has therefore recommended imposition of anti-dumping duties.