TPM Navigation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking on the "I Agree" button, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to TPM Solicitors & Consultants of your own accord and there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or any other inducement of any sort whatsoever by or on behalf of TPM or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.

Home ยป Updates

Initiation of sunset review of anti-dumping duty concerning imports of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin from China (23.09.2025)

Product description โ€“ The product under consideration is virgin bottle-grade Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin having intrinsic viscosity of 0.72 deciliters per gram or higher.

HS Codes: 3907 6110, 3907 6190, 3907 6930, and 3907 6990.

Uses: The product under consideration is used to manufacture preforms for making PET bottles and jars for the storage of mineral water, carbonated soft drinks, edible oils, pharmaceutical products etc.

Countries Involved: China PR.

Applicant โ€“

  1. Indorama Yarns Private Limited,
  2. IVL Dhunseri Petrochem Industries Private Limited
  3. Reliance Industries Limited.

Period of Review: 1st April 2024 to 31st March 2025.

Injury period: 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24 and the period of review. Facts of the present case: The present review application was filed by Indorama Yarns Private Limited, IVL Dhunseri Petrochem Industries Private Limited, and Reliance Industries Limited seeking redressal against likelihood of continuation and recurrence of dumping and injury from subject imports, in case of cessation of anti-dumping duty. The applicants have claimed that the condition of the domestic industry remains fragile even when the duties are in force and that cessation of duty is likely to create price pressure and impact profitability of the domestic industry. It has been noted that the subject imports have increased over the injury period and have entered at prices below selling price and cost of sales of the domestic industry. Further, the applicants have further provided information that China is subject to trade remedial measures in other jurisdictions and there exists significant exportable capacities in the subject country with India acting as a price attractive market. The Authority therefore found sufficient evidence of likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and consequent injury to the domestic industry in the event of cessation of anti-dumping duty.

Stay Updated

Subscribe for latest insights, updates, and exclusive offers